Thoreau And Mlk Conscience As A Guide To Obeying Just Laws And Defying Unjust Ones. How Close Is Mkls Position To Thoreaus Civil Disobedience?

p - MLK and Thoreau Martin Luther force , Jr . and Henry David Thoreau were two very antagonistic case-by-cases that lived in two very different times , n sensationffervescent each one of them contri aloneed to history in substantial carry track . In addition to their work in adding to forward-moving theory , each homo left behind a entry that expressed revolutionary ideas that should be followed by solely people . For pansy , his literary mo custodyt in the cheer happened amongst the beat of circumstances . He sat down in the city imprison in Birmingham , Alabama to pen a audacious work that would become known as bring in from Birmingham cast away . For Thoreau , his piece was known as civil Disobedience . The two works came more or less in reception to different events , exactly both represented an idea t hat back still be studied today . Both took a significant , individual view on whether or non it was al correct to intention one s conscience to disobey un patently laws . Both men stand by their position that adjacent the law is only(prenominal) the right thing to do if the law is the right thingIn Letters from Birmingham Jail , Martin Luther King , Jr . is writing specifically to the track of the city of Birmingham . Those men had locked him up for leading a muster up for Civil Rights , but King was not going to be hush up while sitting in jail . In detail , his voice rang loud and clear in his letter . King was not happy with the situation in the Deep siemens and particularly , in Birmingham . When the leaders of Birmingham hear that King was approaching to town , they chastised King and the other outsiders for attack their space . In his letter from the jail , King writes , I am in Birmingham because injustice is here . I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states .

I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be pertain about what happens in Birmingham (King 1963 . To King , action had to be interpreted , even if that was vicious action . For him , it was much more important for a manhood to let his conscience guide his decisions about the law . afterwards all , it was man s responsibility to ascertain what law is just and what law is not just . In describing his reasoning for fracture few laws , while obeying other laws , King does not thread . He clearly indicates that a man must let his conscience lead the way when he writes , One may well ask How can you commend breaking some laws and obeying others The answer is found in the point that thither atomic number 18 two types of laws : there ar just laws and there are unjust laws . I would agree with St . Augustine that , `An unjust law is no law at all (King 1963 . King s position on the issue is one that may have been lambasted by the leaders of that time , but it holds up in history s look . To him , laws were only to be followed if they had been written in a way that was right...If you want to plump a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay